(AAA Chicago 2008-9) (dispute concerning issues in a sponsored research/patent license agreement)
Author: Doug Gibson
Imation Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics (The Hague 2008-9) (expertise concerning license grant in a patent cross license)
Bingham McCutchen
Anastasia Beverly Hills v. Daiko (C.D. Cal. 2008) (testifying about broad subject matter of trade secrets, degree of misappropriation and territorial aspects of injunctive relief)
Kirkland & Ellis
Neways v. Sisel (D. Utah 2008) (assisting with respect to meeting UTSA requirements for trade secret status)
Sullivan & Cromwell
Comm’n of the European Communities v. Microsoft Corporation (E.C. Comm’n 2007) (issues pertaining to licensing software)
Hughes Hubbard & Reed
Syncsort Inc. v. Innovative Routines In’t (D.N.J. 2007, 2012) (maintenance of trade secret status for licensed software)
KekerĀ & Van Nest, LLP
Sputtered Films Inc. v. Mishkin (Cal. Super. Ct. Santa Barbara 2006) (issues relating to permissible reverse engineering)
Howrey & Simon
NTP v. RIM (E.D. Va. 2006) (expert opinion regarding terms of patent license in major patent dispute)
Duane Morris (NY)
Netherby v. Jones of N.Y. (S.D.N.Y.2005) (issues relating to licensing terminology)
White & Case (Brussels)
Microsoft Corporation v. Comm’n of the European Communities (Ct. of First Instance of EC 2005) (issues pertaining to licensing software protocols and confidentiality)